University researchers conclude that mass startup acquisitions disrupt labor markets for specialized IT workers, reducing employment outlets for IT pros and talent pools for enterprise CIOs. Credit: dotshock / Shutterstock The biggest companies in the world are keeping tech workers’ wages low by buying up companies instead of hiring their talent, creating an increasingly limited number of potential workplaces for developers and other high-tech professionals — all while draining talent pools for enterprise CIOs. This condition — called monopsony, which describes a market in which there is only one buyer — has been fueled by the open practice among tech giants such as Google and Meta of acquiring smaller businesses for their talent, not for their products or patents, according to a new paper published by researchers from Cornell, the University of Toronto, and the Universities of Mannheim and Surrey. “While an oft-mentioned concern regarding large tech firms buying small firms is the potential for such deals to reinforce monopoly power in the product market, we argue instead that acquihiring can be understood as a means of bolstering monopsony power in the specialized labor market,” the researchers wrote. The basic idea, according to the paper, is that the market for specialized technology experts isn’t especially deep — these types of workers only have a limited number of places where they can reach their full potential. Through various tactics — including threatening to pursue a smaller firm’s key workers directly, with aggressive salary and benefit increases — the world’s largest technology firms can leverage their positions to get favorable terms in an acquisition, which brings the smaller company’s workers into the larger company anyway. This creates a situation in which wage competition through direct attempts to hire a given valuable employee are eliminated. Furthermore, gifted workers at startups generally lose ownership stakes and other private benefits during the acquihiring process, the researchers said. “Unsurprisingly, when an acquisition is successful, wages are low and employees with specialized talent suffer,” the authors wrote. Whether the main impetus for the acquirer is the ability to gain the employee’s services without compensating them for private benefits, or the removal of the need to negotiate over a direct hiring, the practice of acquihiring is a harmful one for both the employees involved and the labor market as a whole, according to the paper. By binding these employees up in their ranks through their acquihiring practices, tech giants also sap talent pools for highly sought skills. Enterprise CIOs, who are beginning to make inroads in luring away Silicon Valley–style talent from the traditional hiring market, are less likely to acquire talent through acquisitions, putting them at further disadvantage. The job market for tech workers has been uneven of late, with researcher Victor Janulaitis saying last week that the “first signs” of a downturn are beginning to appear in early 2024. Numerous high-profile companies, including Google, Microsoft, and SAP, have had large-scale layoffs in the past year. Related content news Google spurs US to ease immigration rules for tech talent Citing a US talent shortage, the tech giant has urged the Department of Labor to expand Schedule A occupations to include AI, software engineering, and cybersecurity roles. By Sascha Brodsky May 01, 2024 4 mins H-1B Visas Hiring Technology Industry brandpost Sponsored by Cisco Reduce your network complexity with AI Jumpstart your AI-enabled network transformation now to achieve multiple benefits. By Matt Landry May 01, 2024 5 mins Networking brandpost Sponsored by SAP Internet startup launches while embracing adoption Internet provider Brightspeed had to replicate information from its SAP solutions to AI-ready, data analytics platform Google BigQuery. SAP’s adoption strategy helped empower the company to become an intelligent enterprise. By Keith Elliot Greenberg, SAP Contributor May 01, 2024 4 mins Digital Transformation feature Expectations vs. reality: A real-world check on generative AI Now with the benefit of hindsight, organizations are more aware of moving cautiously to ensure gen AI delivers rather than disappoints. By Mary Branscombe May 01, 2024 11 mins Microsoft Generative AI Development Tools PODCASTS VIDEOS RESOURCES EVENTS SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER From our editors straight to your inbox Get started by entering your email address below. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe